Walgreens v. PWN
District Court of Delaware
- Home
- Retail Litigation Center
- Walgreens v. PWN
Issue on Appeal: Whether the court should review and vacate an arbitral award which, among other things, quoted and relied on language not actually appearing in the relevant provision of a contract while purporting to interpret that provision.
RLC’s Position: The RLC's brief stresses the importance of finality of arbitration awards generally but explains that judicial review is merited in the narrow circumstances in which an arbitrator fails to interpret the actual language appearing in an agreement.
Counsel: Adam Unikowsky and Jonathan (“Yoni”) Marshall at Jenner & Block
RLC’s Position: The RLC's brief stresses the importance of finality of arbitration awards generally but explains that judicial review is merited in the narrow circumstances in which an arbitrator fails to interpret the actual language appearing in an agreement.
Counsel: Adam Unikowsky and Jonathan (“Yoni”) Marshall at Jenner & Block
Latest Retail Litigation Center Insights

Press Release
Monica Welt Named Next RILA GC & RLC President
- 06/02/2025
Press Release
Retailers Weigh-In On AAA’s Proposed Arbitration Rule Change
- By [Deborah White]
- 03/04/2025

Blog Post
CHEVRON OVERRULED: ENDING THE “DIZZYING BREAKDANCE”
- By [Larissa Whittingham]
- 07/01/2024
Press Release
SCOTUS Upholds Public Safety Laws That Help Communities
- By [Deborah White]
- 06/28/2024

Press Release
1st Amendment Requires Overturning NLRB Uniform Decision
- By [Deborah White]
- 05/30/2024
Blog Post
RLC Board Directors & Guest RLC CLOs Sworn into SCOTUS Bar
- 04/17/2024