RAC Acceptance East v. McBurnie
Legal Brief
RAC Acceptance East v. McBurnie
Case: RAC Acceptance East v. McBurnie
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Date: July 15, 2024
Question Presented: “Whether the Federal Arbitration Act permits courts to refuse to sever and compel arbitration of individualized and divisible components of a claim merely because they have been pleaded as a single cause of action with a nonarbitrable request, such as for a public injunction, and the arbitration agreement expressly provides that a ‘claim for relief’ that cannot be arbitration individually is severable and remains n court.”
RLC’s Position: The RLC's brief explains the importance of the question presented, articulates the conflict of the Ninth Circuit’s decision with FAA jurisprudence, and specifies that this case is a good vehicle for clarifying any confusing leading to decisions inconsistent with the FAA after Viking River.
Coalition: The RLC joined a coalition brief led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Counsel: Peter B. Rutledge
Latest Retail Litigation Center Insights
Why Predictable Trade Policy Matters to Retail
Retailers Weigh In on California’s PAGA Reform Rules
RLC Urges High Court Review of Expanded China Tariffs
Retail Litigation Center Leads Debit Fee Cap Fight in Courts