DIRECTV V. IMBURGIA, ET. AL.

‚ÄčIssue: Employment
Court: U.S. Supreme Court

Term: October 2015
Oral Argument: October 6, 2015
Vote: 6-3
Opinion: Justice Breyer
Lower Court: California Court of Appeal, Second District

Question Presented:
Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Ninth Circuit, that a reference to state law in an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act requires the application of state law preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.

RLC's Position:
The RLC joined a brief with other business associations asking the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the California Court of Appeal's decision that the California state-law ban on class-action waivers applies to an arbitration provision governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).  Arbitration allows parties to resolve disputes in a less adversarial and time-consuming manner than in-court litigation. Therefore, the brief asks the Supreme Court to ensure that state courts consistently apply this Court’s precedent that the FAA preempts state-laws that find arbitration agreements unenforceable.

Case Outcome: 
Because the California Court of Appeal's interpretation is pre-empted by the Federal Arbitration Act, that court must enforce the arbitration agreement.  

Procedural History and Case Documents

Please use the DOWNLOAD button below to access the RLC's Brief.

  Download


Stay in the know

Subscribe to our newsletter