Bohr v. Tillamook
Legal Brief
Bohr v. Tillamook
Case: Bohr v. Tillamook
Court: Supreme Court of Oregon
Date: December 21, 2023
Issue on Appeal: Whether a plaintiff must establish class-wide reliance on alleged misrepresentations to bring a claim under the state's consumer protection statute.
RLC’s Position: Oregon law, along with the weight of authority from other jurisdictions, require reliance as a necessary component of causation for misrepresentation claims. Plaintiff’s attempt to import the “price-inflation theory” from the securities context is unavailing because of the diverse motivations leading to consumer purchases.
Other Amici: The RLC joined a brief led by the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, together with: Consumer Brands Association, Food Northwest, National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, Inc., National Retail Federation, and Oregon Business & Industry
Counsel: Elizabeth White, David Fine, and Henry Ross of K&L Gates LLP.
Latest Retail Litigation Center Insights
Why Predictable Trade Policy Matters to Retail
Retailers Weigh In on California’s PAGA Reform Rules
RLC Urges High Court Review of Expanded China Tariffs
Retail Litigation Center Leads Debit Fee Cap Fight in Courts