RAC Acceptance East v. McBurnie
Legal Brief
RAC Acceptance East v. McBurnie
Case: RAC Acceptance East v. McBurnie
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Date: July 15, 2024
Question Presented: “Whether the Federal Arbitration Act permits courts to refuse to sever and compel arbitration of individualized and divisible components of a claim merely because they have been pleaded as a single cause of action with a nonarbitrable request, such as for a public injunction, and the arbitration agreement expressly provides that a ‘claim for relief’ that cannot be arbitration individually is severable and remains n court.”
RLC’s Position: The RLC's brief explains the importance of the question presented, articulates the conflict of the Ninth Circuit’s decision with FAA jurisprudence, and specifies that this case is a good vehicle for clarifying any confusing leading to decisions inconsistent with the FAA after Viking River.
Coalition: The RLC joined a coalition brief led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Counsel: Peter B. Rutledge
Latest Retail Litigation Center Insights
Retail Litigation Center Adds 3 GCs to Board of Directors
Slaughter v. Trump: SCOTUS Implications for Retailers
RLC Welcomes Josh Moore as Vice President of Litigation
Retailers applaud courts rejection of flawed rule that burdens consumers