Drazen v. Pinto
Legal Brief
Drazen v. Pinto
Case: Drazen v. Pinto
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date: May 15, 2023
Issue on Appeal: Whether the receipt of a single unwanted text message constitutes a concrete injury sufficient to confer Article III standing under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA).
RLC’s Position: A single unwanted text message does not constitute a harm under common law jurisprudence. Additionally, Congress cannot create Article III standing; and, regardless, has not attempted to characterize the receipt of a single unwanted text message as a cognizable injury under the TCPA.
Other Amici: The Florida Retail Federation joined the brief.
Counsel: Adam Unikowsky and Jonathan Marshall of Jenner & Block LLP.
Case Documents:
RLC Motion for Leave to File
RLC Brief [Linked in download button below]
Please use the DOWNLOAD button below to access the RLC's Brief.
Latest Retail Litigation Center Insights
RLC Files Supreme Court Brief on Video Privacy Law
Supreme Court Affirms Federal Pesticide Labeling Rules
RLC Files Amicus Brief Challenging Federal Reserve Debit Fee Rule
RLC Supports Illinois Interchange Fee Ban on Taxes and Tips