Robey v. SPARC Group, LLC
Legal Brief
Robey v. SPARC Group, LLC
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date: 2023
Issue on Appeal: Whether a party can be compelled to arbitrate claims involving non-signatories and whether arbitration agreements can be enforced against or by entities that did not expressly consent to arbitration.
RLC’s Position: The RLC argues that arbitration is strictly a matter of consent and should not be extended to non-signatories absent a clear contractual basis. Expanding arbitration obligations beyond the parties who agreed to them would undermine predictability and increase litigation complexity for retailers and other businesses that rely on enforceable arbitration agreements. Maintaining clear limits on who can be bound by arbitration preserves its efficiency and contractual integrity.
Other Amici: Chamber of Commerce of the United States and other business organizations.
Counsel: Counsel from national appellate and arbitration practices representing amici curiae.
Latest Retail Litigation Center Insights
Why Predictable Trade Policy Matters to Retail
Retailers Weigh In on California’s PAGA Reform Rules
RLC Urges High Court Review of Expanded China Tariffs
Retail Litigation Center Leads Debit Fee Cap Fight in Courts