RBS v. Ross
Legal Brief
RBS v. Ross
Issue: Class Action Standards
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Lower Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Questions Presented:
I. Whether it is consistent with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes to hold that a defendant to a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) class action has no right to raise statutory affirmative defenses on an individual basis if the class seeks “only” monetary relief.
II. Whether a district court can conclude that the Rule 23(a)(2) commonality requirement is satisfied when a class claims the denial of overtime pay, without resolving whether dissimilarities in the class would preclude it from establishing liability on a class-wide basis.
RLC's Position:
The RLC urged the U.S. Supreme Court to grant certiorari this case, which presents class action certification standard issues in the Fair Labor Standards Act context.
Case Outcome: In light of the Comcast decision, the Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case for further consideration.
Procedural History and Case Documents:
- Certiorari petition filed August 2012
- Certiorari granted, judgement vacated, and case remanded April 2013
Latest Retail Litigation Center Insights
Why Predictable Trade Policy Matters to Retail
Retailers Weigh In on California’s PAGA Reform Rules
RLC Urges High Court Review of Expanded China Tariffs
Retail Litigation Center Leads Debit Fee Cap Fight in Courts