Leeper v. Shipt, Inc.; Target Corporation
California Supreme Court
- Home
- Retail Litigation Center
- Leeper v. Shipt, Inc.; Target Corporation
Date: January 7, 2026
RLC’s Position: The RLC's brief describes why PAGA plaintiffs cannot disavow “individual” PAGA claims in order to avoid arbitration and go forward with “representative” PAGA claims in court (“headless PAGA”).
Coalition: The RLC was joined by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, The National Retail Federation, the California Retailers Association, the California Chamber of Commerce, and the National Federation of Independent Business.
Counsel: Tritia Murata and James Sigel of Davis Wright Tremaine drafted the brief.
RLC’s Position: The RLC's brief describes why PAGA plaintiffs cannot disavow “individual” PAGA claims in order to avoid arbitration and go forward with “representative” PAGA claims in court (“headless PAGA”).
Coalition: The RLC was joined by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, The National Retail Federation, the California Retailers Association, the California Chamber of Commerce, and the National Federation of Independent Business.
Counsel: Tritia Murata and James Sigel of Davis Wright Tremaine drafted the brief.