Drazen v. Pinto
Legal Brief
Drazen v. Pinto
Case: Drazen v. Pinto
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date: May 15, 2023
Issue on Appeal: Whether the receipt of a single unwanted text message constitutes a concrete injury sufficient to confer Article III standing under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA).
RLC’s Position: A single unwanted text message does not constitute a harm under common law jurisprudence. Additionally, Congress cannot create Article III standing; and, regardless, has not attempted to characterize the receipt of a single unwanted text message as a cognizable injury under the TCPA.
Other Amici: The Florida Retail Federation joined the brief.
Counsel: Adam Unikowsky and Jonathan Marshall of Jenner & Block LLP.
Case Documents:
RLC Motion for Leave to File
RLC Brief [Linked in download button below]
Please use the DOWNLOAD button below to access the RLC's Brief.
Latest Retail Litigation Center Insights
Why Predictable Trade Policy Matters to Retail
Retailers Weigh In on California’s PAGA Reform Rules
RLC Urges High Court Review of Expanded China Tariffs
Retail Litigation Center Leads Debit Fee Cap Fight in Courts