Press Release
Legal Brief
Comcast v. Ramsey
Legal Brief
Comcast v. Ramsey
Case: Comcast v. Ramsey
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Date: October 31, 2024
Question Presented: Does the Federal Arbitration Act preempt the McGill rule?
Summary: The RLC’s brief supports Comcast’s Petition for Certiorari asking the Court to rule on the ongoing validity of the McGill rule. The brief explains that the judicially created “McGill rule” is yet another California attempt to bypass the Supreme Court’s arbitration precedent and is directly foreclosed by AT&T v. Concepion.
Counsel: Jessica Ellsworth, Nathaniel Zelinksy, and Ezra Louvis of Hogan Lovells
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Date: October 31, 2024
Question Presented: Does the Federal Arbitration Act preempt the McGill rule?
Summary: The RLC’s brief supports Comcast’s Petition for Certiorari asking the Court to rule on the ongoing validity of the McGill rule. The brief explains that the judicially created “McGill rule” is yet another California attempt to bypass the Supreme Court’s arbitration precedent and is directly foreclosed by AT&T v. Concepion.
Counsel: Jessica Ellsworth, Nathaniel Zelinksy, and Ezra Louvis of Hogan Lovells
Latest Retail Litigation Center Insights
Press Release
Retail Litigation Center Adds 3 GCs to Board of Directors
Blog Post
Slaughter v. Trump: SCOTUS Implications for Retailers
Press Release
RLC Welcomes Josh Moore as Vice President of Litigation
Press Release
Retailers applaud courts rejection of flawed rule that burdens consumers
Press Release
Monica Welt Named Next RILA GC and RLC President
Become a Member