Drazen v. Pinto
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- Home
- Retail Litigation Center
- Drazen v. Pinto
Case: Drazen v. Pinto
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date: May 15, 2023
Issue on Appeal: Whether the receipt of a single unwanted text message constitutes a concrete injury sufficient to confer Article III standing under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA).
RLC’s Position: A single unwanted text message does not constitute a harm under common law jurisprudence. Additionally, Congress cannot create Article III standing; and, regardless, has not attempted to characterize the receipt of a single unwanted text message as a cognizable injury under the TCPA.
Other Amici: The Florida Retail Federation joined the brief.
Counsel: Adam Unikowsky and Jonathan Marshall of Jenner & Block LLP.
Case Documents:
RLC Motion for Leave to File
RLC Brief [Linked in download button below]
Please use the DOWNLOAD button below to access the RLC's Brief.
Latest Retail Litigation Center Insights
RLC Board Directors & Guest RLC CLOs Sworn into SCOTUS Bar
- 04/17/2024
Retailers Ask SCOTUS: Overturn Harmful 9th Circuit Decision
- By [Deborah White]
- 03/05/2024
Multi-Year PAGA Trials: What’s a Court to Do?
- By [Larissa Whittingham]
- 12/15/2023
Retail Litigation Center Adds New Litigation Counsel
- By [Deborah White, Larissa Whittingham]
- 10/02/2023
Court of International Trade Erred in China 301 Tariff Case
- By [Kathleen McGuigan]
- 07/25/2023
Plaintiffs’ Bar Takes Another Bite at the TRE Apple
- 06/30/2023