This website may use cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can leave if you wish.
Read MoreAccept
Join RILA My Profile
Sign In
Press Releases
Search
Search
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Conferences & Meetings
  • Newsroom
Search Page Tools
  • RILA
    • RILACurrently selected
      • ABOUT US
      • CONTACT US
      • CONFERENCES & MEETINGS
      • NEWSROOM
    • Advocacy
      • Message from President
      • Committees
        • Communications
        • Cybersecurity Leaders Council
        • Government Affairs Committee
        • Privacy Leaders Council
        • Public Policy Steering Committee
        • State Affairs Committee
      • Technology
        • RILA Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Initiative
      • Financial Services
        • Sales Tax
      • Trade
        • Trade
      • Workforce
        • Health Care
        • Labor
      • Retail is For Everyone
    • Asset Protection
      • Committees
        • Asset Protection Leaders Council
        • Asset Protection Steering Committee
        • Crimes Against Business Committee
        • Horizons Committee
        • Workplace Safety Committee
        • Disaster Recovery & Preparedness Forum
        • Operational Audit Forum
      • Conference
      • Forums
      • Resources
        • Beyond Shrinkage - Introduction to Total Retail Loss
        • Mobile Point-of-Sale and Loss Prevention: An Assessment of Risk
        • Opportunities and Challenges for Engaging Merchants in the Protection of Retail Assets
      • Letter from Lisa
      • AP Innovation Awards
    • Finance
      • Tax
        • Tax Committee
      • Committees
      • Resources
      • Revenue-Recognition Redirect to Swipe Fees Page
      • Capitalize Green
    • Human Resources
      • Committees
      • Health Care
      • Labor & Employment
    • Innovation
      • Events
      • Team
      • Sign up
    • Legal / Compliance
      • Committees
      • Product Safety
      • Regulatory Comment Letters
      • Retail Litigation Center
    • Research
      • Apocalypse or Evolution - What Retail Employers Need to Know About Candidate Preferences
      • Retail Accounting Policy Survey
      • Retail Ethics and Compliance Program Survey Report
      • Shopping Styles in the (R)Tech Age
    • Supply Chain
      • Committees
        • Customs Committee
        • Distribution Committee
        • International Trade Committee
        • Supply Chain Leaders Council
        • Supply Chain Security Committee
        • Supply Chain Steering Committee
        • Transportation & Infrastructure Committee
      • Conference
      • Trade
    • Sustainability / Environment
      • Committees
        • Sustainability Committee
        • Retail Horizons Committee
        • Energy Management Program
        • Environmental Compliance Committee
      • Events
      • Energy Management Program
        • Engagement Methods
        • Member Responsibilities
        • Leadership Model
        • Resource Library
        • Industry Report
        • Financial Management
        • Leased Store Management
        • Renewable Energy
        • Workflow and Approval Process
      • Horizons Program
        • About the Program
        • Program Deliverables
        • Work Groups
        • Media Materials & Blogs
        • Sustainability Executive Program
      • CRC Site
      • Sustainability Management Report
      • Energy Management Report
Press Releases
 
  • RILA Experts
  • Press ReleasesCurrently selected
  • RILA Blog
Site Contents
You are here: Skip Navigation LinksRILA » News and Resources » Press Releases

Retailers Urge Supreme Court To Address Split Among Circuit Courts of Appeals

Uncertainty exposes business to expansive, expensive litigation

Arlington , VA - 11/12/2013

Page Content
The Retail Litigation Center (RLC), joined by the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, the Society for Human Resource Management and the National Association of Manufacturers, filed a brief amicus curiae in the Supreme Court of the United States asking the court to grant certiorari to address the split among the Circuit Courts of Appeals on whether security check waiting time is compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The brief highlights the risks that the ambiguity and uncertainty associated with the circuit split poses to businesses across the country if left unaddressed.

The case in question, Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Jesse Busk, et al., saw the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reverse a lower court decision, adopting expansive interpretations of state and federal labor statutes to expand employer obligations regarding employee compensation in such a manner that compliance would require substantial changes to commonly accepted businesses practices, with especially detrimental effects on the retail industry. In adopting the opinion, the Ninth Circuit significantly expanded employer obligations and liabilities inconsistent with the FLSA and demonstrated Congressional intent stemming from the Portal to Portal Act of 1947.

“The actions of the Ninth Circuit, significantly expanding compensation standards, stand in stark contrast with a half century of federal interpretation and are irresponsible,” said Deborah White, president, Retail Litigation Center. “The decision here, if left unaddressed, will unnecessarily complicate human resources practices for all businesses and the expansion of liability opens the door to forum shopping.  The Supreme Court should recognize the harm caused by the legal landscape and accept the case.”

The brief argues that this decision will place employers in harm’s way as litigators seek to bring cases in the lenient forum of the Ninth Circuit, exposing them to harmful class action lawsuits that have the potential to further chill the slim margins of the industry.  In addition, the brief raises concerns about the ripple effects of the legal uncertainty emanating from the court, making compliance with expansive labor regulations even more challenging for employers; the RLC raised these concerns previously in an amicus brief in this case filed with the Ninth Circuit earlier this year.

From the brief filed with the Supreme Court of the United States:

“The Ninth Circuit’s decision in this case thus constitutes a radical departure from long-established regulatory guidance and preexisting precedent. That, in turn, creates the potential for significant and completely unanticipated financial liability for thousands of employers.”

“Accordingly, the Ninth Circuit’s decision has created nationwide legal uncertainty and enormous potential financial liability for thousands of employers. Regardless of whether this Court ultimately agrees or disagrees with the Ninth Circuit’s decision on the merits, employers throughout the United States need a timely and final resolution of the security-screening question.”

“The Ninth Circuit’s decision may require thousands of employers to take immediate and potentially costly proactive action in an effort to protect themselves against the type of copycat suits that are already being spawned by the Ninth Circuit’s decision.”

The complete brief can be found HERE. The brief was written by Proskauer Rose LLP attorneys James F. Segroves, Kenneth D. Sulzer and Laura Reathaford.

The Retail Litigation Center is a public policy organization that identifies and engages in legal proceedings which affect the retail industry. The RLC, whose members include some of the country’s largest retailers, was formed to provide courts with retail industry perspectives on significant legal issues, and highlight the potential industry-wide consequences of legal principles that may be determined in pending cases.

 

###

Brian Dodge
SVP, Communications & State Affairs
Phone: 703-600-2017
Email: brian.dodge@rila.org

 

Retail Industry Leaders Associations
© Retail Industry Leaders Association

1700 N. Moore Street
Suite 2250
Arlington, VA 22209
(703) 841-2300
Home Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Site Map
Disclaimer:
The Site materials are provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal, financial or other professional advice. See Terms of Use for complete information.